Pale Blue Inspiration!

I actually teared up listening to Sagan's heartfelt and inspirational speech. So motivational, so awesome, so humbling. Please watch this video.

Comments

  1. UrukFebruary 23, 2010 at 6:35 PM

    Oh, yeah, I've seen this. The guy that told me about this said he cries every time he watches it.

    I got a little misty eyed, too.

    Being godless still has wonder, amazement, and beauty.

    I wish Sagan was still around. We still need someone around with his oratory skill and wisdom from the scientific community.

    ReplyDelete
  2. UrukFebruary 23, 2010 at 7:28 PM

    Oh yeah, I also read that a person's awareness of numbers is in direct proportion with their awareness of humanities size in the universe.

    I plan to blog about that in a few weeks. Sharing Carl Sagan's "Pale Blue Dot" might also be appropriate. Thanks for bringing this up again.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Tristan VickFebruary 23, 2010 at 11:57 PM

    I recently read how the odds of a number confuses us and there is a psychological reason for this, interestingly enough.

    So I don't doubt that setting in contrast disproportionate sums is difficult for some people.

    My math is mediocre at best. So I can see it perhaps causing a greater confusion with regards to sizing up the universe.

    ReplyDelete
  4. UrukFebruary 24, 2010 at 7:45 PM

    My math stinks, too. But after reading up on some science and finance, I see that math is a language where we cannot afford illiteracy. Math has the power to describe so much of what we cannot see with our eyes or even arrive to with our imaginations alone. I took a chance and read Einstein's "layman's"version of Relativity. He wrote it for the person who is *not* mathematically inclined. Regardless, you come to clearly you see that mathematics opens the door for even arriving at much of the scientific discovery over the past few hundred years, even if you don't walk way really understanding everything Einstein talked about. You get the gist of it at least and realize that numbers are far more important that we give them credit. I wish I understood math better.

    I'm working on it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Conflating Atheism and Agnosticism is a Mistake

Image
In a discussion over at Bud's blog Dead Logic , a reader asked a question I have been hearing more and more recently. It's a good question, so I thought I would do my part to try and answer it. Doesn't admitting to being an agnostic instead of an atheist FEEL like you're being wishy-washy, or not fully committing to your "belief"? ... I understand that it's only honest to say that we CAN'T be sure, but I sure do hate to show weakness (real or perceived) in an argument. Not at all.  Agnosticism deals with knowledge.  Atheism deals with belief.  The Agnostic position cannot assume whether a thing like a God could exist or not given the lack of sheer evidence for such a things existence. Therefore knowing with any given certainty just isn't possible. The agnostic then makes the claim that a definitive answer with regard to "knowing" of God's existence cannot be given either way. Atheism, however, can state with assurance t
Read more

Discussing the Historicity of Jesus with a Christian Agnostic

Image
Steven Jake, the author of the up and coming blog  TheChristian Agnostic , [1]  wrote a rather thorough response to my lengthy comment asking him about the state of the evidence regarding the historical Jesus. I am pleased he took the time to write a thorough response. I only feel that such a thorough response deserves my own more detailed response as my initial comment was merely that—a comment. So without further ado I will address some of Steven Jake’s comments and concerns. Initially Steven Jake (henceforth SJ) posted a quote from New Testament scholar Bart Ehrman claiming that there is an abundance of evidence for a historical Jesus. I merely contested this claim asking for what evidence we have that would be considered historically reliable. As I see it there is none. That doesn’t mean, however, I don’t think there  wasn’t  a historical Jesus, just that we cannot prove if there was or wasn’t and so I remain agnostic as to the historicity of Jesus—not a mythicist
Read more